Euthanasia is often classified in two categories: dor valett and active. In supine euthanasia revives will intentionally let the enduring die by stopping any kind of treatment. However, in active euthanasia doctors will accelerate the process to tin the life of the patient directly, with procedures such as the lethal guessing method or drugs. Some people believe passive euthanasia is less morally wrong than active beca consumption the doctor is not exactly killing a patient. James Rachels states at that place is no distinction surrounded by passive and active euthanasia, the intentions argon the same.
I potently agree with Rachels belief because passive euthanasia is just as wrong as active because, in my opinion, both are murderous and both result in someone dying. To make this clearer, I am going to use the cases Rachels used. There is a man named Smith and a man named Jones. They both stand to gain a large inheritance if anything should happen to their six year old full cousin. The difference between the two cases is that Smith plans to drown his cousin, and Jones walks in on his cousin drowning and decides not to do anything about it. They are both felonious right? Yes, due to the fact that they both helped in killing their six year old cousin. With that being said, I strongly believe there is no distinction between passive and active euthanasia, and they...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment