In 2001, the Church of England's Board for Social righteousness in Great Britain called for the decriminalization of marijuana because they felt the indemnity of imprisoning people for marijuana possession lead to disrespect for the jurisprudence among young people, and was only randomly enforced (The Church). They also give tongue to there was no link between the use of marijuana and an increased risk of hard drug use pull in a very tiny minority of cases. They verbalize the criminalization of marijuana makes its association with hard drugs even to a greater extent likely.
On December 5, 2002, the Canadian Justice Minister Martin Cauchon proclaimed that he was planning to proceed with the decriminalization of marijuana possession in Canada early in 2003 (Stock). This was followed by an announcement by Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien on April 30, 2003, that the legislation decriminalizing possession of marijuana in Canada would soon be denote (PM). Protestors against the criminalization of marijuana held a Million Marijuana swear out in Prague in 2003 as part of a 170-city global protest (Hrobsky).
In Czechoslovakia, possession of more
"Investigating possible medical uses of marijuana." 15 whitethorn 2002. 5 May 2004.
Martin notes that an Institute of Medicine report recommends that in the meantime, marijuana be made available to patients with debilitating ailment that is refractory to other therapies, provided it is given under medical inspection and its effectiveness assessed. He concludes by saying that the basic principles of medicate should not be disregarded for political expediency in the case of any therapeutic agent, controversial or not.
"The effect of Marijuana Decriminalization." 5 May 2004.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment