Struggle in Poverty by President Johnson

But that is just the root" (Johnson 1). Johnson understood the dire economic conditions of m both Americans, including poor snow-covered Appalachians and poor minority urban residents. Johnson created the Office of Economic prospect (OEO) as the agency responsible for running the War on Poverty.

Rebuilding penury-stricken, minority urban areas, increasing employment, increasing training, bolstering education, creating bleak industries and enacting improved wel remotee measures were all part of Johnson's War on Poverty. The passage of the Civil Rights Bill and huge tax reductions in personal and corporate income tax were undertaken as a instrument of leveling the playing field between rich and poor, minorities and whites, and they were manipulaten as a means of stimulating the economy and new industries. In 1961 when Eisenhower was president, only 45 domestic social programs were in existence, just by the time Johnson left office that number had travel to 435 while federal social spending rose from $9.9 cardinal to $25.6 billion (Did 1). As one historiographer notes, "Johnson's ?war on poverty' represented the broadest attack Americans had ever waged on the special problems liner poor and disadvantage families. It declared decisively that the problems of the poor?problems of housing, income, employment, and health?were ultimately a federal responsibility" (Did 1). We can see how far a commission in ideology this

Until our political sympathies policies are aimed in this direction, it is doubtful any of us will ever live in a truly Great edict.

Johnson's attempts to rebuild urban ghettos were undermined by galore(postnominal) factors. We have already mentioned the Vietnam War and his enmity for Robert Kennedy as study diversions. However, part of the problem for failure lie in Johnson's principle that community action was the answer to solving the problems in urban ghettos. Johnson believed on advice from the OEO that the ghettos were strained but strong ethnic enclaves. Because of this, he though community action with federal support would judge the problems found in many urban areas across America.

natural and independent community organization in poor neighborhoods would be given federal funds as a way of resolving problems associated with poverty. Many in his administration, including Robert Kenney, were opposed to such tactics, contention that they represented far too little to resolve the far too enormous problems found in the inner cities. Robert Kennedy was substantially familiar with the ghettos and life there, as he continually visited them during the completely of his political life. Johnson's experience with the ghetto came in a story almost his servants who were refused motel and restaurant services as they traveled across country. Further, Johnson viewed Kennedy as keeping the liberal and intellectual support he in demand(p) at bay. He eventually viewed any of Kennedy's policies to combat poverty as a vote against him and for Kennedy. As one historian notes, "In the final stages of his presidency the idea of large-scale government programs for the ghettos had become so bound up in his look with liberal opposition to him that Johnson became positively hostile toward them" (Lemann 6). Thus, Johnson's failure to net the War on Poverty and build the Great Society was a combination of domestic, foreign, political and personal factors.

Anonymous. Did the United States meet the war on poverty?
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.